A British judge ruled on the eve of Al Gore co-winning the Nobel Peace Prize that students forced to watch “An Inconvenient Truth” must be warned of the film’s factual errors. But would there be any science at all left in Gore’s “truth” if these errors and their progeny were excised?
Steven Milloy has a very interesting take on Judge Justice Burton’s ruling. His opinion piece explores Gore’s film in light of items that must be removed in order for teachers to not have to warn students about the “facts” presented by “An Inconvenient Truth”. About 25% of the film would have to be removed. That may not sound like a lot but most of the remaining 75% is self-promotional Gore footage.